4 ms·

Owners being able to lock the value generated by workers solely within their family for generations has been tried. It ends in feudalism.

• nfw2 4mo ago
  Are you proposing changing inheritance laws or are you proposing forcing companies to sell their stock in a firesale to be in accordance with the IRS? Be clear in your propositions please.
  • paulryanrogers 4mo ago
    Progressive taxation, taxes on CG, inheritance taxes, and a well funded and non-partisan IRS.
    • nfw2 4mo ago
      None of these will prevent someone from gaining more than 100M. That is what is under discussion. I am not against more progressive taxes. Which party is the IRS partisan towards? What do you mean by partisan?
      • paulryanrogers 4mo ago
        https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/experts-warn-trump-immunity-from-irs-audit-could-undermine-trust-in-tax-system https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/experts-warn-trump-imm... https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-irs-investigations-left-leaning-groups-democratic-donors-612a095e https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-irs-investigations...
        • nfw2 4mo ago
          I agree these are partisan and bad developments. It is also unrelated to the question at hand about how to prevent people from gaining over 100m which people have been able to do under the heretofore non-partisan irs
      • bluecheese452 4mo ago
        What do you mean by “is”? What do you mean by “you”? By clear.
• seventytwo 4mo ago
  It doesn’t end in feudalism. It ends in guillotines.