4 ms·
But not a very accurate blogpost. "Here's why this literally cannot work (in theory)" to denigrate a system that actually works (in practice). Their goal is to
by anonymous908213 4mo ago
But not a very accurate blogpost. "Here's why this literally cannot work (in theory)" to denigrate a system that actually works (in practice). Their goal is to convince people to stop using it because it personally inconveniences them, but they never provide an alternative solution that actually solves the problem (in practice) that Anubis actually solves (in practice). If leaving the problem unsolved (in practice) was a desirable option, the site owner would not have turned to Anubis in the first place.
- yunwal 4mo agoI'm totally out of the loop here, where's the evidence that this works in practice?
- patchtopic 4mo agobefore and after apache logs showing much less crap in them from bots. Do you think the maintainers of https://lore.kernel.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/ would leave something in that didn't work? It isn't perfect but I have run it on a (much smaller) web site getting hammered by bots and logged "before" and "after" and the difference is measurable.
- chlorion 4mo agoIts literally trivially objectively measurable, this isn't something that is based in opinion. You can throw it up on your own website and simply grep the logs if you don't trust it, or look for the analysis reports from people who have done exactly that. Like the other commenter said, why would linux.org deploy and leave deployed a technology that did nothing? Do they just enjoy trolling users? I doubt it.