3 ms·

Initial testing seems promising. 5.2 found a fair few issues in code generated by 5.1 Also seems much more determined to do things the "right" way. e.g. Saw ha

by Havoc 5mo ago

Initial testing seems promising. 5.2 found a fair few issues in code generated by 5.1 Also seems much more determined to do things the "right" way. e.g. Saw hardcoded credentials and wanted to purge that from git history and integrate a vault into the project Feels a little slower, but I suspect what I'm feeling is verbose thinking rather than slower raw tokens

shostack 5mo ago
I wonder how many issues 5.1 could have caught if you ran it as multiple adversarial reviews against the original output it gave you.
- Havoc 5mo ago
  Well I did run deepseek against the original. They all seem seem to spot different issues