3 ms·
It would make more sense to have specialized versions of Claude instead of having a universal one ie BioClaude, ProgrammerClaude, NuclearClaude, CyberSecurityCl
by chaostheory 4mo ago
It would make more sense to have specialized versions of Claude instead of having a universal one ie BioClaude, ProgrammerClaude, NuclearClaude, CyberSecurityClaude, et al
This would be both safer and less annoying to use.
- OutOfHere 4mo agoThat seems bad because it kills interdisciplinary science.
- chaostheory 4mo agosure, but how else would you better guarantee safety? How else can we avoid annoying guardrails? Besides, it's not like you can't have different agents with skills collaborating
- matheusmoreira 4mo ago> how else would you better guarantee safety? You wouldn't. This safety nonsense is overrated.
- OutOfHere 4mo agoSafety is a lie. It's always possible to divide a task into subtasks, to use abstractions, and the LLM will allow each of these individually. For example, If you want it to write malware, break that down into a hundred high level steps, then implement each one individually, then stitch them together. A dumber but uncensored agentic LLM will even do this for you to control the censored smarter LLM.
- chaostheory 4mo agoIf safety is a lie, then the arguement for massive and overbearing regulation and controls gets a massive boost