4 ms·
Preventing Akonadi/Nepomuk/Strigi nonsense from running helps with resources quite a bit (unless, of course, one actually uses them). My Ubuntu with KDE uses le
by klearvue 14y ago
Preventing Akonadi/Nepomuk/Strigi nonsense from running helps with resources quite a bit (unless, of course, one actually uses them). My Ubuntu with KDE uses less than 400MB RAM idle and without the above.
- stiff 14y agoSad are the times when running your idle desktop environment with less than 400MB RAM usage is considered an achievement.
- emilsedgh 14y agoKDE as 'Desktop Enviroment' is consuming less than 200MiB on my machine. That includes kwin, window manager plasma-desktop, desktop and panel krunner, application launcher kded4, multiple daemons A complete session of KDE includes Nepomuk and Akonadi which are libraries helping KDE's applications, not the 'Desktop Enviroment'. Disclaimer: Im a KDE contributor. Edit: formatting.
- klearvue 14y agoIt's 2012 and my laptop has 8GB of RAM, which means that my booted-up idle machine with a modern graphical DE uses less than 5% of available RAM. I wouldn't call it sad.
- brazzy 14y agoNot really, when even low end laptops have 4GB RAM. There's nothing horrible about using the resources you're given.
- mhurron 14y agoNEW low end laptops. My Linux desktop maxes out at 4GB. Not everyone is buying a new machine every 12 months. Resource constraints are still something that people have to work with. When you're developing for yourself its fine to just make it work on what you have but when you're trying to get others to use your project 'works for me, buy new hardware' isn't going to win you fans.
- brazzy 14y agoSure, you shouldn't use the most recent hardware as your target, but neither should you spend development time and code complexity to avoid overtaxing 10 year old hardware.
- rat87 14y agoI actually got Nepomuk/Strigi and it was awesome just as good as windows search.