3 ms·
> what is Platner for? Not being MAGA. I have some respect for Susan Collins. But this nonsense where a tattoo and infidelity should be disqualifying on one si
by JumpCrisscross 5mo ago
> what is Platner for?
Not being MAGA. I have some respect for Susan Collins. But this nonsense where a tattoo and infidelity should be disqualifying on one side while the President, popularly elected this time, sleeps with porn stars and endorses anti-Semites and KKK adjacents, is unsustainable. If we need a dude with a Nazi tattoo to win Maine, I guess I prefer to be pissed off and winning.
- Arodex 5mo agoI have the fear that Platner will just be another Fetterman, and you will have brought this unto ourselves...
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> Platner will just be another Fetterman This reminds me of the folks who had conniptions over Sinema and Manchin. You know what we'd have if we had four of those right now? A majority.
- ngcazz 5mo agoAs if that has ever overcome the American media and political classes' fixation with bipartisanship (which is how the American system inoculates itself against left-wing policy)
- afavour 5mo agoA majority that does what exactly, though? Manchin was against Build Back Better, expanding voting rights legislation and codifying abortion rights. Yes, he was better than a Republican. But he was a big reason why Democrats are seen as the do-nothing party who never achieve things. Because he stood in the way of it. Not to mention, Fetterman isn’t Manchin. Manchin at least voted to impeach Trump, Fetterman is skeptical of even doing that.
- Ylpertnodi 5mo ago>"Democrats are seen as the do nothing party". Quite a few people I know [eu based] used to consider themselves 'democrats' ie not republicans. But, more and more are co.ing to the conclusion that the dems are pretty darn useless.
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> A majority that does what exactly, though? Doesn’t confirm Pam Bondi and Pete Hegseth. Doesn’t confirm a new numpty to SCOTUS. Doesn’t blow the budget on a fake deportation push and tax breaks for the rich. I agree Democrats have no agenda. But Republicans don’t seem to either right now. They have talking points. But the policy passed bears no resemblance to those in the slightest.
- alchemism 5mo agoFear not: “As you can all probably tell, I got a lot of criticisms about the way this government functions. But in order for us to make it functional, we’re gonna have to do stuff,” Platner said. “And you can’t just go down there and be John Fetterman and ... just sort of be an a*hole.” Source: https://nebraska.tv/news/nation-world/graham-platner-calls-potential-democratic-colleague-senator-john-fetterman-an-asshole https://nebraska.tv/news/nation-world/graham-platner-calls-p...
- ngcazz 5mo agoI feel like Maine's about to lie down with dogs over this.
- pjc50 5mo ago> Not being MAGA Yes, but that should be baseline for the Democrat candidate? Are there really no better candidates in Maine? This sort of thing would be regarded as disqualifiing in the UK even for local councilors from the far right. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/may/27/calls-barnsley-reform-councillor-resign-apparent-swastika-tattoo https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/may/27/calls-barns...
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- xhkkffbf 5mo agoIt was rather disappointing to listen to Jodi Kantor of the New York Times come up with reasons why, well, it's different this time.