4 ms·
But the problem is people are not just delegating formulaic procedural prose to AI. They're using AI to write entire scientific papers, so now reviewers have to
by zetalyrae 4mo ago
But the problem is people are not just delegating formulaic procedural prose to AI. They're using AI to write entire scientific papers, so now reviewers have to use Pangram[0] to screen submissions. Literary magazines have the same problem[1]. Maybe those people should know that their behaviour is bad.
[0]: https://blog.neurips.cc/2026/06/02/ai-generated-papers-in-the-neurips-2026-position-paper-track/ https://blog.neurips.cc/2026/06/02/ai-generated-papers-in-th...
[1]: https://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/ https://neil-clarke.com/a-concerning-trend/
- drdaeman 4mo agoAh, yes, although that’s a different situation from the linked post, more disrespectful (and potentially nefarious) than a sloppy readme. In those cases, most likely, more than just laziness is involved.