3 ms·
> but in practice, even if you are That part is up to Anthropic. KYC[0] is not exotic, it's just a pain in the butt: if Fable is that good, they can do the KYC
by biztos 4mo ago
> but in practice, even if you are
That part is up to Anthropic. KYC[0] is not exotic, it's just a pain in the butt: if Fable is that good, they can do the KYC.
I don't think this is the right move from the government, but we shouldn't pretend that "citizens only" is an insurmountable hurdle for a company that just got a $65B capital infusion.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_your_customer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_your_customer
- tankenmate 4mo agoSure, but what if that "known good customer" proxied access to someone else?
- biztos 4mo agoThis is a problem that banks deal with all the time. It truly is a pain in the butt. But if access to (US banking | Fable) is worth it, you do the annoying work, and the customers accept the annoying limitations.
- Muromec 4mo agoThen Anthropic did their part and blames the good customer after implementing "reasonable" measures to prevent it. They still get paid.