3 ms·
It's a small difference, but if you had a choice between "more efficient AND less maintenance" and "less efficient and more maintenance" then it's easy to see w
by handstitched 4mo ago
It's a small difference, but if you had a choice between "more efficient AND less maintenance" and "less efficient and more maintenance" then it's easy to see why the permanent-magnet solution is preferred.
- namibj 4mo agoThe actual alternative is induction motors, which are just a bit less efficient than PMSM and otherwise basically the same. Except that the frequency fed to them isn't exactly proportional to speed. They've been used to great success since we had the needed power electronics to drive the electric trains of Europe.
- mcdonje 4mo agoAnother comment said they're not using brushes, so they shouldn't need more maintenance.