4 ms·
https://archive.ph/lXw7j https://archive.ph/lXw7j
by sschueller 4mo ago
https://archive.ph/lXw7j https://archive.ph/lXw7j
- catlikesshrimp 4mo agoIf Cannot resolve archive.ph host Access the .is domain https://archive.is/lXw7j https://archive.is/lXw7j internet archive cannot resolve either
- tremon 4mo agoarchive.ph works fine for me. Resolves to 168.222.241.49 archive.ph 2a09:b280:fe00:5a:d197:eab6:9aa0:f22 archive.ph
- buildsjets 4mo agoFind a better network service provider, you are being censored by yours.
- cluckindan 4mo agoPlease don’t use these sites, they alter archived content and use visitor browsers as a ddos botnet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidan...
- themafia 4mo agoThen I'd have to ask of publishers please don't use subscription oriented paywalls. I'd be happy to pay for an article here and there. I do not want to understand your subscription model, compare benefits between "tiers" of subscriptions, or think about how to cancel when I eventually realize I'm not getting the value I hoped for. This is the price of that dark pattern. These sites wouldn't exist if they acted like publishers instead of retailers.
- reaperducer 4mo agoMost digital subscriptions to large news organizations are in the order of $5 - $10/month. If you can't afford 16¢ a day, then you have bigger problems. If you don't want to pay monthly because you find it inconvenient, well boo hoo. Just do without. The world, and its journalists, don't owe you anything. I find the exercise of buying a car to be tedious. That doesn't justify me just driving one off the lot without paying.
- eqvinox 4mo agoExcept it's not one subscription, it's a subscription to whatever today's post links to. It sums up. Same reason Netflix had massively reduced video piracy, and that piracy being back nowadays.
- reaperducer 4mo ago[flagged]
- reaperducer 4mo agothey alter archived content and use visitor browsers as a ddos botnet. Interesting. I'm surprised I didn't notice it on HN. From Wikipedia: In January 2026, archive.today added code into its website in order to perform a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack against a blog.[2] This code uses the computers of visitors of the site to repeatedly send requests to the blog, with the goal of overwhelming the blog's ability to handle legitimate traffic. The code is still present as of 5 June 2026, but has been modified to reduce the frequency of malicious calls. [3] On June 12, at least two users reported their requests were redirected to tehrantimes.com. Some common ad blockers, such as uBlock Origin, are currently stopping these malicious requests. It was later discovered that archive.today tampered with archived web pages.[4] It was also later discovered that this was not the first DDoS attack Archive.today has performed.