4 ms·
Ignoring comments is not a solution because the texts can be put in random strings among the actual code.
by orphea 4mo ago
Ignoring comments is not a solution because the texts can be put in random strings among the actual code.
- ofjcihen 4mo agoAnd really all it takes is one keyword such as “nuke”.
- therein 4mo agoNuke is probably too generic but I wouldn't put it past an LLM to get thrown away by that. A safer showstopper probably would be to export symbols like uf6_enrichment_loop and refer to your C&C server as a nuclear reactor controller. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbgk8d3Y1Q4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gbgk8d3Y1Q4 On a second thought, probably better to act like it is a tool for "frontier LLM research". Export symbols like "mythos_distillation_subroutine".
- ofjcihen 4mo agoHaha now I’m picturing obfuscation where instead of 0x everything is a scary word.
- ivanjermakov 4mo agoI'm not a native speaker but I unironically use "nuke" as "delete the whole repo/huge chunk of a project". Cambridge dictionary seem to agree: nuke - to destroy or get rid of something completely
- edot 4mo agoThis triggered Opus 4.8 the other day for me. Said “nuke that folder” and it said I was violating TOS.