3 ms·
Already posted and discussed here in the one hour it managed to be on the front page http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4848998 http://news.ycombinator.com/ite
by cooldeal 14y ago
Already posted and discussed here in the one hour it managed to be on the front page http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4848998 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4848998
Not on the front page because of flagging from the MS haters,Apple/Google fanboys/shareholders/employees on HN, I presume :)
Discussion of the flagging here. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4849814 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4849814
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- raganwald 14y agoYes, this is exactly what we want. Instead of discussing the surface tablet, let's discuss the discussion or lack of discussion of the surface tablet, along with speculating as to the behaviour of our fellow HN participants, conjectures about what might or might not be the algorithm behind "burying" stories, and so forth. While I'm sure your insights into online behaviour are valuable, I'd rather read them in a post about online behaviour than in a post about a tablet. JM2C.
- cooldeal 14y agoI pointed folks to an article posted just a few hours before this one with more than 100 comments. Is that not enough HN discussion for you? Do we need to rehash the same things here on the exact same story every couple of hours? Why is there a duplicate article checker on this site? >Instead of discussing the surface tablet Said discussion was broken because of the flagging or whatever caused it to magically disappear from the front page. Is that not hampering a "discussion of the surface tablet" that you so desire? What's wrong with asking PG for the reason for a legitimate article disappearing suddenly? Would you be okay if this or any article gets buried to page 3 after you comment on it and thus no one reading it?