There were two sentences. I looked into the second sentence. It's the more interesting case precisely because it was an outlier with no US bases, US assests, e

There were two sentences. I looked into the second sentence. It's the more interesting case precisely because it was an outlier with no US bases, US assests, et al. > your own explanation convicts Iran. Not my explanation, see the linked discussion. > ... do you believe them? Are you that gullible? Tell me more about when you stopped beating your wife. > then the next day Iran fired another volley of drones at Oman. I believe I looked into Azerbaijan which may have been hit by an independent IRG cell, IIRC Oman is an entire other country. > Furthermore, your "false flag theory" is flawed. Not my theory - see the linked discussion.