3 ms·
I think the idea of offshore wind is nice. There is a lot of ocean out there and by putting the "ugly" (I don't mind them.) turbines out of sight we get the bes
by _carbyau_ 4mo ago
I think the idea of offshore wind is nice. There is a lot of ocean out there and by putting the "ugly" (I don't mind them.) turbines out of sight we get the best of both worlds.
But the realities of the idea - the engineering - is problematic.
The ocean is a harsh environment and maintaining something deliberately put out of the way in a harsher environment is far more expensive.
- mcmoor 4mo agoThere are a lot of ocean, but limited shores. I guess that's the only economical place to build it, but of course it blocks scenery. If people truly built it in open ocean, less people will complain.
- leonidasrup 4mo ago"It is very hard to build robust and secure wind farms in water deeper than around 200 feet (~60 m)" https://profession.americangeosciences.org/society/intersections/faq/what-are-advantages-and-disadvantages-offshore-wind-farms/ https://profession.americangeosciences.org/society/intersect...
- Retric 4mo agoThat’s ~true for now but keep the date someone said it in mind. It’s really easy to keep thinking technical limitations still true when they are wildly out of date.
- leonidasrup 4mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_wind_turbine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_wind_turbine The biggest is Hywind Tampen, Max. water depth 300 m NOK 8 billion ($730 million; $8.3m/MW)