Defensive HN replies about "AI" water use seem more incriminating than the title or even the contents of this article There is nothing to indicate 2.5B is too

Defensive HN replies about "AI" water use seem more incriminating than the title or even the contents of this article There is nothing to indicate 2.5B is too much, too little or just right. This is just reporting data. But HN replies are extraordinarily defensive. Why The replies are reminiscent of those in threads under submissions reporting facts about "crypto" not too long ago, before SBF went to prison and the crypto hype subsided