4 ms·
I would rather see native browser support for the familiar MHTML (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40873 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?i
by TazeTSchnitzel 4mo ago
I would rather see native browser support for the familiar MHTML (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40873 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40873) than creating a brand new format that does the same thing.
The AI slop homepage is really offputting too.
- xnx 4mo agoChrome started supporting this at some point (though I wish they would've added in motw support). Lack of support for mhtml is one of the things keeping me away from Firefox on mobile.
- yeargun 4mo agoCompletely agree with that. But look whats the situation with MHTML. """ Open Bug 40873 Opened 26 years ago Updated 27 days ago """ So if you need some such feature in your web app, and if you are okay with 2kb encode/decode js. Its all good. At least the posts are pretty much not AI slop I guess.. But I'll take your feedback. Thanks!
- bjt12345 4mo agoThis cute homepage provides me with nostalgic memories of Geocities spinning skull GIFs.
- Tade0 4mo ago> Opened 26 years ago Updated 27 days ago That's a particularly long discussion.