4 ms·
The announcement elucidated this, and it's IMO worse than this. They don't downgrade to a cheaper model ([edit] for certain classes of offense they suspect you
by CGamesPlay 4mo ago
The announcement elucidated this, and it's IMO worse than this. They don't downgrade to a cheaper model ([edit] for certain classes of offense they suspect you of). They sabotage the model's outputs in other, undisclosed, ways (specifically, "prompt modification, steering vectors, or parameter-efficient fine-tuning"). So, for example, they might load in a steering vector that just forgets the API to PyTorch. But it isn't just "we redirected you to a cheaper model!"
- buildbot 4mo agoIt honestly explains so many issues I have been having, as I used it primarily for ML research (on my personal account, doing things not related to my job I should note). It would literally typo package names and spend huge amounts of time failing to setup simple environments…then do stupid things like set the learning rate to 1e-7, and use the eval set as training data.
- junofan 4mo agoThat’s insane. I hope they fix it.
- sterlind 4mo agojust imagine if they made it sneaky. get things just subtly wrong enough that your training runs just never quite go as well as you think they should.
- notrealyme123 4mo agoIt burned through all of my tokens in a very short time. I wonder if it their ML mitigations leads to model into deadlocks.
- razster 4mo agoThis explains why I've been running into some odd roadblocks. Welp that sealed the deal, I'm going to be cancelling our company sub, not worth it.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- yaur 4mo agoDid my Claude get permanently dumber today because I asked fable to assess my Fairplay integration?