2 ms·

I get a much better starting point in much less time. So you're not actually reviewing the results? If you were, the time wouldn't be "much less". You're gett

I get a much better starting point in much less time. So you're not actually reviewing the results? If you were, the time wouldn't be "much less". You're getting something that you *assume* is a better starting point but you don't really know if the results are flawed or not. If Google AI was telling people your mom was an ax murderer, would you *assume* it is providing a good starting point? This is what AI does --- it lulls people into accepting bad results as a time saver. And this is the root of legal liability issues.

verdverm 5mo ago
I review the relevant results, instead of every search link that comes back, many of which are irrelevant. I also spend less time clicking in the browser. I'm very much human-in-the-loop oriented. If you had seen any of my talks, you would understand this. Please refrain from making assumptions about how everyone uses Ai and putting them into a single classification. It's not what's going on.