3 ms·
Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.
by knicholes 4mo ago
Are you a bot? Look in the title. Papers with code.
- camdenreslink 4mo agoTo be fair PwC is a very well established initialism. It would be like saying HTTP but actually referring to something other than the well understood meaning of that thing.
- minimaxir 4mo agoThe context of the PwC acronym is extremely unambigious in the comment.
- throawayonthe 4mo agowhat's the well established initialism? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PWC is it one of these?
- stronglikedan 4mo ago> To be fair PwC is a very well established initialism. If that were the case, I'd expect to be able to learn what it stands for in the first page of google results, but alas... And you know what is on the front page? PricewaterhouseCoopers
- camdenreslink 4mo agoI think you agree with me? It is unambiguously associated with PricewaterhouseCoopers.
- clickety_clack 4mo agoIts not even just commonly used. I’d say if papers with code tried to refer to themselves as PwC they’d get a cease and desist.
- peterfirefly 4mo agoNo, but I hate TLA overuse. Don't you? "Are you a bot" is an obvious slur when it's easy to see for yourself that I'm not.
- wahnfrieden 4mo agoIt’s not overuse when first use in context is spelled out.
- digitalPhonix 4mo agoI still don't see where HF is explained?
- knicholes 4mo agoI just don't see how you could have read the title (and comments) and not figured out that PwC was Papers With Code as a human, especially as it's mentioned in the comment with that acronym.