2 ms·
100% agreed, the "this is what an agent looks like to write" is the wrong pitch for a new agent framework. The better pitch would be, "this is how easy observa
by brotchie 4mo ago
100% agreed, the "this is what an agent looks like to write" is the wrong pitch for a new agent framework.
The better pitch would be, "this is how easy observability, guardrails, monitoring, deployment, evals, versioning, A/B testing are with our framework." What the agent code looks like is somewhat incidental.
- peterbell_nyc 4mo agoThis this this! Anyone have something they genuinely like for all of this? For now I'm rolling my own, but I can't believe I won't find a better OSS alternative soon...
- agentdev001 4mo agoNvidia Openshell solves most of the hard problems I've run into while building stuff in this space. Observability is, for my purposes, solved by a given framework supporting OpenTelemetry. Guardrails is where I've gotten the most value of openshell being a neat package. Agent workload scope is written as policy in openshell, and capability is backed by openshell handling all execution. Monitoring/deployment/versioning is helped as well, depending on how agents/runners are slotted into the system. Deployment namely is quite well supported- openshell has kube/helm bits that are experimental atm, but seem like a logical approach imho. Evals and a/b testing isnt something ive explored in depth, considering that agents with composable tool sets + frontier models are beyond my expectations already.
- brotchie 4mo agoWe need the equivalent of the MEAN / LAMP stackronym for agents.
- msradam 4mo ago[dead]