4 ms·
Interesting, but the timeline seems to be inaccurate.
by cyphersanctus 14y ago
Interesting, but the timeline seems to be inaccurate.
- isleyaardvark 14y agoIt's a list of calendar dates, not an actual timeline.
- ksmiley 14y agoThat explains it. I was confused when I read "Destruction of the Ring" a third of the way through, and "Fellowship begins Quest" at the very end. I wonder whether the developers _could_ have put them in chronological order, ex. 12/13/3019 appearing before 03/18/3021; or if the format requires the ordering it has now.
- vec 14y agoIt's probably out of order on purpose. I'm betting this was some of the test data that the developers used, and they just left it in when they finished.
- xyzzyb 14y agoNo, the calendar files are anniversaries not timelines. Have some fun: alias anniversaries="ack -a -h `date +"%m/%d"` /usr/share/calendar | sort"
- graywh 14y agoMy system has calendar.ubuntu with dates ordered by version number and calendar.debian with multiple groups of dates ordered by year.
- davidw 14y agoIt's because after the destruction of the ring, everyone switched to the Gregorian calendar and added a leap day.