3 ms·
its not inaccurate though. consider Purdue pharma - the Sacklers got off with all their wealth intact because they were too big to sue and properly collect mon
by 8note 4mo ago
its not inaccurate though.
consider Purdue pharma - the Sacklers got off with all their wealth intact because they were too big to sue and properly collect money for their victims.
- oaiey 4mo agoBut we agree that this was also wrong, right?
- account42 4mo agoYeah its wild to see people actually using "kill a million people and its a statistic" as a defense rather than to point out injustice.
- intended 4mo agoJust because someone got away with it means everyone should get away with it ?
- drawfloat 4mo agoNo they got away with it through a combination of lax pharmaceutical laws, and because they were rich and connected to the officials who should have investigated them. They're also almost universally regarded as having committed evil acts at this point, so who cares why they got away with it?