47 ms·
Some of the new and open models are very capable now, The truth is, the value of the model is in the mind of the user - the big names are impressive to those wh
by bigbadfeline 5mo ago
Some of the new and open models are very capable now, The truth is, the value of the model is in the mind of the user - the big names are impressive to those who know little and are dazed by little, but they are bound to end up wrong regardless of how good the model is.
- jatora 5mo agoThis is ridiculous. How about the rational users who use the best current model regardless of brand? The value of the model is in the quality of the output over time. I give every major model a chance. Coding and scripts in the chat are nothing compared to the power of agentic SWEEEEEEEEE. And nothing is remotely close to claude and gpt. If you're comfortable with being well behind SOTA intelligence, then good for you, but some of us prefer to be efficient with our time and resources. With your mindset, you will never truly SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
- jpfromlondon 5mo agothat isn't rational, rational is using the model that can best solve your current problem in the timeliest cost considered manner. I'm not working on the frontier problems, I don't need god-in-a-box for $600 per month.
- jatora 5mo agoits not god in a box and its not $600 per month and almost nobody is working on frontier problems. they just want frontier intelligence to solve their given problems in a superior manner. you're minimizing and exaggerating all of the wrong things. cope more i guess - more compute for us!
- jpfromlondon 5mo agoYour comment makes it pretty clear that mine went over your head and that's fine, these tools are for people like you, godspeed.