3 ms·
> All these points are valid, and OpenAI did a great job identifying potential risks, especially misuse and biases, at an early stage. Many of the OpenAI emplo
by riknos314 4mo ago
> All these points are valid, and OpenAI did a great job identifying potential risks, especially misuse and biases, at an early stage.
Many of the OpenAI employees who were focused on these risks in GPT-2 later founded Anthropic, notably Dario [1]. Since the beginning and continuing through today Anthropic describes itself as an "AI safety and research company" [2]
I'm not sure if the OpenAI of today has the same focus on safety, or if they do the minimum to not look irresponsible given Anthropic's effort.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dario_Amodei https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dario_Amodei
[2] https://www.anthropic.com/company https://www.anthropic.com/company
- supern0va 4mo agoJust to be clear: that is quoted text from the source and not a statement I'm making, in case that's what you're suggesting here.