3 ms·
It's not even very usable... I tried 2 different chats and both eventually got stopped due to the safeguards One was a piece of code I gave it to improve, it d
by mpeg 4mo ago
It's not even very usable... I tried 2 different chats and both eventually got stopped due to the safeguards
One was a piece of code I gave it to improve, it did so and then started writing tests, some of which tested security so the safeguards triggered
Another was one of the cryptography puzzles I use as new model tests, which are hard to oneshot and there's no public solution anywhere, it completely refused to even try to solve it
- Erem 4mo agoSo the degradation to Opus 4.8 from the article isn't happening in practice?
- mtkd 4mo agoNo, you get a AUP violation and have to manually swap the model (I had same issue, just asked it to check some code that 4.8 had modified earlier in day)
- andai 4mo agoMaybe that's only in the chat UI, and not the API?
- mpeg 4mo agoIt is, it asks you if you want to continue as opus 4.8… but I was trying precisely to evaluate fable
- CSSer 4mo agoOh joy. A model whose safeguards make it prone towards code that make your systems less safe. How brilliant!
- gavinray 4mo agoI tried 2 chats and it declined both. - 1st chat asked about a minor shoulder injury most likely mechanisms - 2nd chat asked about optimal bloodwork testing markers
- kranke155 4mo agoit seems to dislike biological chats. Rejected me on a chat that I am running with 4.8 as well on a rare condition I have.