5 ms·
the problem with this argument is that there is not an unlimited capacity for telcos to transmit these messages. if 1,000,000 people decided they needed to send
by leeoniya 14y ago
the problem with this argument is that there is not an unlimited capacity for telcos to transmit these messages. if 1,000,000 people decided they needed to send a message to mars in the next 6 hours, you can bet your ass those messages would be $25.00 each, or more.
it's also not fair to simply compare the amount of data. when you send a message you're borrowing a channel / band. the transmission tech and spectrum has a certain capacity, that's why it gets auctioned and licensed for big bucks. i would also not be surprised if telcos spent 400 million maintaining, updating and building out the infrastructure. btw, someone correct me if i'm wrong here.
i'm not defending the fact that text messages are extortion in every sense of the word and the reality that they're more expensive than a real-time voice call is the part that's really hard to grasp.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- jacquesm 14y ago> the problem with this argument is that there is not an unlimited capacity for telcos to transmit these messages. No, the problem is that there is a fixed amount of bandwidth to each phone used for status messages anyway so even if you wanted to get unlimited capacity to a device you could not. It's not as if these text messages are sent in a stream of their own, they simply ride along on slots already allocated to your device. From a telco perspective they're 100% free.