4 ms·
This is shady. Copyrighters absolutely not get to control use of their copyrighted material when people mentally, sonically, or physically reproduce it for pers
by khelavastr 4mo ago
This is shady. Copyrighters absolutely not get to control use of their copyrighted material when people mentally, sonically, or physically reproduce it for personal use.
It's absurd to say "you can't record this book to a friend or robot".
Nobody seems to actually reproduce the copyrighted materials.
High-dimensional eigendecompositions which underpin AI similarity are some of the most literally derivative materials of texts that you can imagine.
- conartist6 4mo agoSo you record a copy "for a friend" and then you sell lots of those copies as your business. All within your rights! What's mine is yours, my Comrade! (my point being that it would be different if the product CommonCrawl provides were trained models, but this is not the case: its product is unlawful reproductions of copyrighted data for commercial use)
- joshuaissac 4mo ago> then you sell lots of those copies as your business Common Crawl is not a business and is not selling anything.
- conartist6 4mo agoIt's awfully hard to claim you aren't selling anything when you're giving other people's stuff away for free and they would be selling it if you hadn't, um, "saved them the trouble"