3 ms·
But it is controlled for the wrong criterias. "Natural" doesn't mean healthy or good for the environment. It is only greenwashing and "appeal to nature" fallac
by jenadine 4mo ago
But it is controlled for the wrong criterias.
"Natural" doesn't mean healthy or good for the environment.
It is only greenwashing and "appeal to nature" fallacy
- kakacik 4mo agoStrong claims require strong evidence, not just throwing random fashionable words others are using. Your claims are very strong.
- jenadine 4mo agoDo you need evidence that "Natural doesn't mean healthy or good for the environment"? Asbestos, is "natural". So is Arsenic. And CO2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature Or do you need evidence that the bio labels are not optimizing for health or environment? Check the rules. Most of them are just there to restrict synthetic products, regardless of their impact. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_certification#False_assurance_of_quality_and_environmental_benefit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_certification#False_as...