4 ms·
At the time Apple made this decision there wasn’t as strong of a difference in model quality between Google, anthropic, and OpenAI as there is now. Also Apple d
by changoplatanero 4mo ago
At the time Apple made this decision there wasn’t as strong of a difference in model quality between Google, anthropic, and OpenAI as there is now. Also Apple definitely burnt some bridges with OpenAI on the agreement they made together a year earlier.
- xnx 4mo ago> wasn’t as strong of a difference in model quality between Google, anthropic, and OpenAI as there is now What's the difference now? I would guess 9/10 people here would have a very hard time telling the models apart in a blind taste test.
- Terretta 4mo ago> What's the difference now? Well, which ones are on my Mac locally? Which ones are in my iPhone locally?
- kshacker 4mo agoEspecially if you are not asking siri to code stuff. If your use case is still "personal context" with "conversation", even if there is a 9/10 difference, the users may see their abilities going from 3/10 presently to 6/10 or 7/10, and still a massive upgrade for most of them. I think therapy and scientific research may remain in the domain of frontier chat interfaces for another year.