> which isn't "his" in the first place, by any standard definition I was saying that because of the previous comment: > to Scam Altman's creation It wasn't d

> which isn't "his" in the first place, by any standard definition I was saying that because of the previous comment: > to Scam Altman's creation It wasn't derived in the same way though - I can read loads of books and so can write my own book, but that's not derivation in the same way as the Deepseek's derivation.