4 ms·

Besides common sense given the clear geopolitical context, sources like: [1] https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.

Besides common sense given the clear geopolitical context, sources like: [1] https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/DeepSeek%20Final.pdf https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/se... [2] https://ai.americansecurityproject.org/news/ai-imperative-2030-featured-in-the-washington-examiner https://ai.americansecurityproject.org/news/ai-imperative-20... and more. Of course, you can choose to ignore America-biased sources, but since it aligns with the obvious.

throwaway67678 4mo ago
There is no evidence in those sources that DeepSeek is "subsidized" by the CCP in the way people imply (e.g. in an actively malicious*, market-distorting way that undercuts the competition, early Uber-style). They do receive tax breaks for their R&D research, a very common scheme in Europe (and which also used to be the case in the US, I believe). They also have public-private partnerships, e.g. the state is one of their clients. Also common in every free market economy. (SpaceX anyone?) *This does not invalidate other concerns (censorship, privacy) but the way people phrase it makes it look like DeepSeek and co. are 'cheating' somehow with their business model by 'distorting' inference cost to make it way artificially lower than its 'natural price' (either notion being hopelessly naive)
- SubiculumCode 4mo ago
  "According to a report from Securities Times (a Chinese state-owned newspaper), Zhejiang Oriental, a listed company under the Zhejiang Provincial SASAC, participated in the angel round of financing of DeepSeek through its Hangzhou Oriental Jiafu Venture Capital Fund."[1] "The Zhejiang Provincial State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) is the provincial government agency in Zhejiang, China, responsible for managing, regulating, and overseeing the state-owned assets and enterprises owned by the provincial government." [2] What does this imply? A state-owned company in China invested a ton of money into DeepSeek. aka State subsidization. [1] https://www.americansecurityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/DeepSeeks-Deep-CCP-Connections-AI-Imperative-2030.pdf https://www.americansecurityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2... [2] https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/zhejiang-provincial-energy-group-company-ltd-18-08-2024 https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/zhej...
  - throwaway67678 4mo ago
    Again, that's besides the point. So the state is an investor in DS, and? Many companies in Western capitalist economies receive initial state funding, especially startup grants. The real point to make is: does the state purposely fund the structural expenses of all those companies at a loss in an effort to undercut the competition and without which they would all go bankrupt and the cost of inference would be naturally much higher and couldn't be possibly optimized? I have yet to see evidence of that, especially given the continuous and prolific R&D from Chinese labs (or the panic at Meta when DS-r1 came out) that does show optimization gains are in fact possible.
    - SubiculumCode 4mo ago
      An angel investor is an investor who provides early-stage capital to startups and entrepreneurs in exchange for ownership equity. That is not a grant or initial state funding. That is ownership. There are very few examples, especially prior to Trump, of government ownership/stakes of public companies. But I will concede this: Due to the opaque nature of the Chinese economy to public scrutiny, we might never know. I am sure, however that substantial use of Chinese inference (not their models per se, but on their servers) is, in aggregate, presents a substantial national security risk for the West. Heck, AI all by itself, without even considering other nations, is a national security threat of the near future, where national security is broadly construed as any threat against its people's welfare, no matter the actor.
      - throwaway67678 4mo ago
        >That is not a grant or initial state funding. That is ownership. There are very few examples, especially prior to Trump, of government ownership/stakes of public companies. Maybe not in the US (although Musk getting state subsidies comes to mind), but very common in Europe. Quite a few founder friends of mine have gotten started with state funding (through various R&D promoting agencies). Angel investing is not the only startup funding structure out there
  - maxglute 4mo ago

throwaway67678 4mo ago

There is no evidence in those sources that DeepSeek is "subsidized" by the CCP in the way people imply (e.g. in an actively malicious*, market-distorting way that undercuts the competition, early Uber-style). They do receive tax breaks for their R&D research, a very common scheme in Europe (and which also used to be the case in the US, I believe). They also have public-private partnerships, e.g. the state is one of their clients. Also common in every free market economy. (SpaceX anyone?) *This does not invalidate other concerns (censorship, privacy) but the way people phrase it makes it look like DeepSeek and co. are 'cheating' somehow with their business model by 'distorting' inference cost to make it way artificially lower than its 'natural price' (either notion being hopelessly naive)

SubiculumCode 4mo ago
"According to a report from Securities Times (a Chinese state-owned newspaper), Zhejiang Oriental, a listed company under the Zhejiang Provincial SASAC, participated in the angel round of financing of DeepSeek through its Hangzhou Oriental Jiafu Venture Capital Fund."[1] "The Zhejiang Provincial State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) is the provincial government agency in Zhejiang, China, responsible for managing, regulating, and overseeing the state-owned assets and enterprises owned by the provincial government." [2] What does this imply? A state-owned company in China invested a ton of money into DeepSeek. aka State subsidization. [1] https://www.americansecurityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/DeepSeeks-Deep-CCP-Connections-AI-Imperative-2030.pdf https://www.americansecurityproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2... [2] https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/zhejiang-provincial-energy-group-company-ltd-18-08-2024 https://www.fitchratings.com/research/corporate-finance/zhej...
- throwaway67678 4mo ago
  Again, that's besides the point. So the state is an investor in DS, and? Many companies in Western capitalist economies receive initial state funding, especially startup grants. The real point to make is: does the state purposely fund the structural expenses of all those companies at a loss in an effort to undercut the competition and without which they would all go bankrupt and the cost of inference would be naturally much higher and couldn't be possibly optimized? I have yet to see evidence of that, especially given the continuous and prolific R&D from Chinese labs (or the panic at Meta when DS-r1 came out) that does show optimization gains are in fact possible.
  - SubiculumCode 4mo ago
    An angel investor is an investor who provides early-stage capital to startups and entrepreneurs in exchange for ownership equity. That is not a grant or initial state funding. That is ownership. There are very few examples, especially prior to Trump, of government ownership/stakes of public companies. But I will concede this: Due to the opaque nature of the Chinese economy to public scrutiny, we might never know. I am sure, however that substantial use of Chinese inference (not their models per se, but on their servers) is, in aggregate, presents a substantial national security risk for the West. Heck, AI all by itself, without even considering other nations, is a national security threat of the near future, where national security is broadly construed as any threat against its people's welfare, no matter the actor.
    - throwaway67678 4mo ago
      >That is not a grant or initial state funding. That is ownership. There are very few examples, especially prior to Trump, of government ownership/stakes of public companies. Maybe not in the US (although Musk getting state subsidies comes to mind), but very common in Europe. Quite a few founder friends of mine have gotten started with state funding (through various R&D promoting agencies). Angel investing is not the only startup funding structure out there
- maxglute 4mo ago