3 ms·
> MiMo V2.5 Pro ... lower cached price At the moment of writing https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343690 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343690 MiM
by smartbit 4mo ago
> MiMo V2.5 Pro ... lower cached price
At the moment of writing https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343690 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343690 MiMo V2.5 Pro had a lower cache hit ratio. From the article:
OSS models, depending on who you use them from, make a huge difference, mostly due to cache-hit rates.
Model Cheapest effectiveInputPrice (Provider)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 0.3720 (Xiaomi)
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) 0.0560 (DeepSeek)
- amunozo 4mo agoCould it be that it changed recently, or am I missing something? Both prices are the same https://openrouter.ai/compare/xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro/deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro https://openrouter.ai/compare/xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro/deepseek/... EDIT: okay I misread it, does this mean that DeepSeek reuses a higher percentage of tokens at cache price that MiMo, am I right?
- smartbit 4mo agoCorrect. According to https://minimaxir.com/2026/05/openrouter-hy3/#llm-economics-in-2026:~:text=That%E2%80%99s%20a%202%25%20cache%20read,a%20calculator%20for%20that%20one%29 https://minimaxir.com/2026/05/openrouter-hy3/#llm-economics-... [0] when served by DeepSeek, Cache Read Costs/Input Costs are a very low percentage: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0.83% DeepSeek V4 Flash 2% Notice that OpenRouter response caching is not available when account-level ZDR is enforced [1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317294#48317823 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317294#48317823 [1] https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/features/response-caching#limitations https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/features/response-caching#...