> Editorial choices on raw scientific data are a big no-no. I don't think you can find a picture in an article that hasn't been photoshopped in one way or anot

> Editorial choices on raw scientific data are a big no-no. I don't think you can find a picture in an article that hasn't been photoshopped in one way or another (which is mostly ok as long as it is not misleading) Edit: TF's reply is interesting https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/life-science/antibodies/invitrogen-antibody-validation/image-transparency-frequently-asked-questions.html https://www.thermofisher.com/es/es/home/life-science/antibod... Basically they say they are reviewing the images