2 ms·
This doesn't seem at all related to the above comment - or anything, for that matter. Nobody is suggesting we "replace labor" with LLMs.
by pc86 4mo ago
This doesn't seem at all related to the above comment - or anything, for that matter. Nobody is suggesting we "replace labor" with LLMs.
- vrganj 4mo ago> Nobody is suggesting we "replace labor" with LLMs. I take it you haven't been listening to what the guys at the AI labs have been saying? Plus that's what the whole article is about. I'm not sure how you could've missed that?
- pc86 4mo agoYou could replace every software engineer on the planet with a perfect LLM tomorrow and it would not lead to mass unemployment-triggered riots. If you're talking about software engineering specifically, you're not correct. If you're talking about all labor, you're talking about something unrelated to the article.
- vrganj 4mo agoTo quote the article: > Take copywriting. It was a profession that took years to master and paid well. This changed slowly as more professionals joined the market, even after the demand spike driven by ecommerce and adtech. Now, LLMs have destroyed the job for the vast majority of professionals.
- philipwhiuk 4mo agoThe job of software engineering is more or less literally to automate every other job. If there are no software engineers it's because everything is or has been automated. If AI isn't capable of that then there's still software engineering to do and your argument collapses.
- queenkjuul 4mo agoThe article very explicitly discusses the replacement of all knowledge workers. You sure you read it?
- rfgplk 4mo ago> Plus that's what the whole article is about. I'm not sure how you could've missed that? Even if code typing goes away, a new breed of engineering will take it's place.
- jason_oster 4mo agoDo you normally listen to quacks? You clearly don't believe them. Why are you even paying any attention to it?