3 ms·
That's why there are companies specialising in AI for physics, like Emmi AI (now part of Mistral). If BMW and Airbus go on stage to talk about how they're using
by sofixa 4mo ago
That's why there are companies specialising in AI for physics, like Emmi AI (now part of Mistral). If BMW and Airbus go on stage to talk about how they're using it for their physics simulations, it's probably at least decent.
- 20k 4mo agoUsage isn't really a good indicator of quality currently in the AI space, the issue is that there's inherently no way that an AI physics sim can be as good as a real physics simulation, which makes it a very low value prospect
- sofixa 4mo agoUsage by reputable engineering organisations with strict compliance and external testing validation (most notably Airbus, they have to prove to EASA that their tests are real and representative) is a decent indicator that there is something there.
- wolvesechoes 4mo agoDo we have real case studies, or just a bunch of declarations? "Using AI for our physics simulations" is as vague as it can be.
- sofixa 4mo agoIt's all proprietary of course, but we have press releases talking about it: https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T0458125EN/bmw-group-and-mistral-ai-advance-ai-in-crash-simulation?language=en https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/global/article/detail/T045812...
- 20k 4mo agoThere is absolutely no data, review, evidence, or any indication whatsoever of how this is being used, or what the efficacy of it is The current trend of every industry is to jump onto anything, call it AI, and pretend its being used everywhere. There's absolutely good reason to be sceptical of this