> It's 11775 commits in 10 years. My concern is not the number of years, but instead the number of commits. It implies linguistic volatility and a lack of a co

> It's 11775 commits in 10 years. My concern is not the number of years, but instead the number of commits. It implies linguistic volatility and a lack of a coherent design and/or vision. Where is the rationale which explains the voluminous number of commits?