3 ms·

(2012), maybe?

• JdeBP 4mo ago
  It is StackExchange. So in theory someone could modernize it at any time.
  • robrain 4mo ago
    Indeed and I just saw it was edited in 2012 - originally posed in 2011, answers last updated in 2014.
    • ciupicri 4mo ago
      Yeah, it seems I improved a tiny tiny bit a couple of them.
  • trumpdong 4mo ago
    No, that would be reverted for "violating the author's intent" if you edited an existing answer, and if you posted a new answer it'd be permanently at the end of the list because it would never attract many votes due to being at the end of the list.
    • josephcsible 4mo ago
      > No, that would be reverted for "violating the author's intent" if you edited an existing answer Can you link to an example of when that happened when it shouldn't have? > if you posted a new answer it'd be permanently at the end of the list because it would never attract many votes due to being at the end of the list. No it wouldn't. They added a new answer sort called "trending" and made it the default specifically to fix that problem.