3 ms·

> You made the claim that companies require apps because it has lower friction for ordinary users. I did not. > That claim is in error. My motivation to furt

• zrm 5mo ago
  > I did not. This is the exact quote: > And at least for connected devices at home, a dedicated app can have lower friction for initial setup for the "I'm not a computer person" crowd than other alternatives do. What good does it do you to dispute that you implied it as a justification for the status quo when your error is contained in the part you're not disputing?
  • ssl-3 5mo ago
    I meant precisely what I wrote, and not a single word more nor less. > implied Any implied meanings are your own creations, not mine. I assure you that if I had meant something different than what I wrote, then I would have written something different instead. I'm not shy. Be well.