2 ms·

Except you provided no argument. Explain why the AI gang, like a rich kid who run a high debt at the Casino, during their drunken weekend in Vegas...is frenetic

Except you provided no argument. Explain why the AI gang, like a rich kid who run a high debt at the Casino, during their drunken weekend in Vegas...is frenetically calling on daddy US to bail them out: "US officials eye government stakes in AI companies" - https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-officials-eye-government-stakes-ai-companies-notus-reports-2026-06-05/ https://www.reuters.com/legal/transactional/us-officials-eye... "Trump to meet AI leaders to discuss US investment in their companies" - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98r8r7dz5no https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98r8r7dz5no They are facing a Capex of 2 to 3 trillion until 2030, and have now realized they are out of money.

Levitz 5mo ago
[flagged]
- tcp_handshaker 5mo ago
  I see...So the argument is not wrong because you refuted it... instead because you promoted yourself to the position of deciding which claims are allowed to be subjected to scrutiny and evidence. :-)) "What we know about the plan to give Americans an equity stake in AI" - https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6a00 https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6... "OpenAI discussed government loan guarantees for chip plants, not data centers, Altman says" - https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-government-guarantees-massive-ai-data-center-buildout-ceo-2025-11-06/ https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-govern...
  - dang 5mo ago
    Can you please stop posting in the flamewar style to HN? You've been doing it a lot lately. You've also been breaking the site guidelines in other ways, such as by being snarky, crossing into personal attack, accusing other users of bad faith ("who do you work for?") and so on. That's not the curious conversation that HN is supposed to be for, and we ban accounts that keep posting like this. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Levitz 5mo ago

[flagged]

tcp_handshaker 5mo ago
I see...So the argument is not wrong because you refuted it... instead because you promoted yourself to the position of deciding which claims are allowed to be subjected to scrutiny and evidence. :-)) "What we know about the plan to give Americans an equity stake in AI" - https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6a00 https://www.ft.com/content/8559a3f9-86de-4a1c-8a75-6623e83e6... "OpenAI discussed government loan guarantees for chip plants, not data centers, Altman says" - https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-government-guarantees-massive-ai-data-center-buildout-ceo-2025-11-06/ https://www.reuters.com/business/openai-does-not-want-govern...
- dang 5mo ago
  Can you please stop posting in the flamewar style to HN? You've been doing it a lot lately. You've also been breaking the site guidelines in other ways, such as by being snarky, crossing into personal attack, accusing other users of bad faith ("who do you work for?") and so on. That's not the curious conversation that HN is supposed to be for, and we ban accounts that keep posting like this. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.