4 ms·
Being a Chief Technology Officer is no longer the job. We now need an end-to-end AI orchestrator for the corporation in the Chief Agentic Officer role. Dana Law
by glimshe 5mo ago
Being a Chief Technology Officer is no longer the job. We now need an end-to-end AI orchestrator for the corporation in the Chief Agentic Officer role. Dana Lawson is now obsolete and must be let go.
- wnevets 5mo agoIt sure is convenient AI isn't capable of doing the c-suite's job
- smrtinsert 5mo agoThe brutal reality being its probably most capable in that domain. They'll freely admit they're not "the never the smartest guy in the room" and their decision record proves it
- ramon156 5mo agoThe higher up the ladder, the more incompetent they become IMO. If you're in the seat, no one will force you out. They'll leave, but they can't make you leave.
- ValentineC 5mo agoHuman C-suites will continue to keep their jobs as long as other humans in similar positions continue to buy into their airy-fairy "strategy" stuff. ;)
- fidotron 5mo agoThe enormous question here is if AI works the way these people say then surely competing companies will emerge that are enormously smaller and more agile, thus eating their lunch completely. The fact this doesn't appear to be happening suggests something different is in play.
- cactusplant7374 5mo agoToken generation speed is too slow for that to happen. One can’t easily replicate an enterprise.
- LtWorf 5mo agoUse more than one single account?
- cactusplant7374 5mo agoNot everything can easily be run in parallel. But I do have more than one account.
- halfcat 5mo agoOne difference is, when the business hits a tough patch, the bank starts asking questions, and whether or not the bank lets it all continue depends primarily on whether there’s a CEO/CFO who: - Has history with the bank (trust) - Is willing to put their neck on the line AI in the current form has no ability to put its neck on the line.
- whstl 5mo agoThey're only called CTO if they're from CTO region of France. Otherwise it's just sparkling AI-Cheerleader.
- analogpixel 5mo agoIf a CTO said something in the woods, and no one re-posted it, are they still a CTO or just a crazy person screaming in the woods? By amplifying his message you are justifying his job, position, and standing. This got me thinking on a new way to improve the news: Instead of reporting on the empty words people say, only report on what they have done, example: a) Elon Musks says SpaceX is the best thing ever worth the most money ever because he is greatest person ever. as opposed to: b) SpaceX, run by Elon Musk, is currently Making $X per quarter, they do this by ......
- jareklupinski 5mo agothe first engineer that creates a public company all by themselves will prove / get it all
- throw1234567891 5mo agoWow, you got agitated. Writing code was never a job. Software engineering is a job where part of the responsibility is to create code. “Writing code” in itself means nothing.
- signatoremo 5mo agoBut what do you think about her opinion? Is writing code still a job of developers going forward? and why?
- techblueberry 5mo agoI actually think almost everything she’s describing is basically writing code. I remember Mitchell Hashimoto wrote this blog post saying he wished people didn’t take “infrastructure as code” literally. That “infrastructure as code” really meant something more like “infrastructure as documented specification” In the agile spirit of “working software over comprehensive documentation” I do think the future of software engineering is writing code. Speaking through code is not a philosophy that’s going away any time soon imo. If anything, code is that much more important than it was before.