3 ms·
No, you see; that is why your take is so ungoated. You know it is not an impossible claim, you also have access to internet, but you opt for benefit of the doub
by asdfsa32 4mo ago
No, you see; that is why your take is so ungoated. You know it is not an impossible claim, you also have access to internet, but you opt for benefit of the doubt. As I said, there is a line between fair benefit of the doubt and the taste of shoe leather.
- somewhatgoated 4mo agoYea I did 5 minutes research on google and nothing turned up. If it’s such an outrageous case it should be easy to find - so your point is that I should invest hours trying to prove some claim that some rando typed on here while taking a shit. Nah bro a goat like me has much better things to do. If you make outrageous claims the burden of proof is on you and not the people you’re talking to.
- asdfsa32 4mo agoYou don't have to prove anything, but given the staggering amount of evidence to support such event as likely, you opt to dismiss it without evidence. Like I said, shoe leather.
- somewhatgoated 4mo agoSince there is such a staggering amount of evidence around, care to provide even a single piece?
- asdfsa32 4mo agoEvidence for what?
- somewhatgoated 4mo agoThat in Germany “they also arrest a guy for writing some random Arabic on a flag because Hamas also has a flag written in Arabic” - that was what I didn’t believe initially, and what you called me a bootlicker for lmao
- asdfsa32 4mo agoYes.