3 ms·
Curious to see when a post from OpenAI will appear with the corrected theory or something. This seems to be an ideal scenario for them to go after another scien
by cpard 4mo ago
Curious to see when a post from OpenAI will appear with the corrected theory or something. This seems to be an ideal scenario for them to go after another scientific case. They have the theory, they have the experimental proof that it’s wrong, exactly what you need for an agentic loop to do its work.
Or maybe what works in math doesn’t work with chemistry?
- vi_sextus_vi 4mo ago>[theorists disagree] that the discrepancy is as significant as it appears. It was predicted by decade old "theory" (with a single equation,and it seems that the original paper has no equations at all) so OAI/DeepMind can quietly check if it's in the training or if they can extrapolate, yes https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2752 https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2752 https://cen.acs.org/articles/85/i18/Boron-buckyball-predicted-stable.html https://cen.acs.org/articles/85/i18/Boron-buckyball-predicte...
- cpard 4mo agobut is it worth the effort from a PR perspective for them? I guess we will have to wait and see.