4 ms·
They have proven to the world they have a deterrent akin to a nuclear weapon, but they can actually use it.
by avidphantasm 5mo ago
They have proven to the world they have a deterrent akin to a nuclear weapon, but they can actually use it.
- etiam 5mo agoNot denying they're getting great leverage from that. I still don't quite understand why the shortcut is supposedly so irreplaceable.
- Exoristos 5mo agoPerhaps because modern economies are allergic to long-term planning.
- etiam 5mo agoPerhaps. And seemingly also a bit even to short-term reactive adaptation?
- thisislife2 5mo agoIt is not irreplaceable - you can avoid it as a shipping route and take a longer route. It's just more costly because it is a long route. Which means higher oil prices, which is universally unpopular everywhere with the citizens. (In oil-importing economies, oil prices have a rippling effect as any increase in oil prices increases the transportation cost of goods there by resulting in price increases of all such goods).
- etiam 5mo agoThat's pretty much what I've been thinking. Maybe I'm underestimating how much more expensive, but it seems for most of those ships if they'd got going on an alternative route instead of crowding around the peninsula they'd be arriving soon. For all I know the goods they're carrying may already have been sold at a rate assuming the cheap freight of course...
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> they have a deterrent akin to a nuclear weapon Far from akin to. It's a good deterrent. Tehran still isn't Pyongyang.