2 ms·

That's mostly papering over design mistake that most syscalls doesn't accept target pid. Otherwise you could just create suspended process, configure it with sy

That's mostly papering over design mistake that most syscalls doesn't accept target pid. Otherwise you could just create suspended process, configure it with syscalls that explicitly take target pid, and start it.

uecker 4mo ago
Maybe, I am not saying fork() + exec() model couldn't be improved, but most people saying it is "terrible" and it needs to die seem to go on to propose something substantially worse.
trumpdong 4mo ago
Or have a syscall that runs any other syscall in a different process.