4 ms·
I'm recommending all three. In most companies, your boss and possibly your team will pressure you to devote 100% of your available energy to the project that yo
by michaelochurch 14y ago
I'm recommending all three. In most companies, your boss and possibly your team will pressure you to devote 100% of your available energy to the project that you've been assigned to, and let all of your long-term or external interests slide "for now". Don't. It's a classic newbie mistake.
You need to figure out what efforts are actually important and will keep you in good standing, but also sneak away time for your own career goals. This will (a) ensure progress that's independent of local political winds and (b) give you a head start if things go to hell (which they can easily do, because even if you have a good boss, there might be a problem with his boss-- or boss^2, or boss^3) and you end up looking for another job.
- Surio 14y agoTime Zone latencies. I hope you are continuing to read the thread. :-] >> Don't. It's a classic newbie mistake. Not helping my cause here, but I am a 10+ year industry "veteran" with those problems :O But sometimes it is easier said than done -- at least that's how things seem to load on my plate. Do you remember the old chestnut on rocks, stones, pebbles and sand [Well, here it is: http://justinlim.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/of-rocks-pebbles-and-sand-who-are-the-rocks-in-your-life/ http://justinlim.wordpress.com/2006/11/28/of-rocks-pebbles-a...]. Somehow it seems like I am always given sand, filled to the brim in my bottle, right from the start! :-/ P.S: there's also a "beer" joke version of it that is probably more popular: http://www.avolites.org.uk/jokes/rock.htm http://www.avolites.org.uk/jokes/rock.htm Anyway, I thought I grasped it correctly, and you have confirmed it. >> there might be a problem with his boss-- or boss^2, or boss^3) and you end up looking for another job and you end up looking for another job. And that's how the credits seem to roll as well :-[