3 ms·

As of 11 minutes ago, the headline is now the opposite of that submitted: > Astronauts told to return to International Space Station after sheltering over air

by js2 4mo ago

As of 11 minutes ago, the headline is now the opposite of that submitted: > Astronauts told to return to International Space Station after sheltering over air leak repairs.

caminante 4mo ago
Oh, so it's a live blog with updates and a dynamic headline.
- deleted 4mo ago
  [deleted]
- mynameisvlad 4mo ago
  It has "Live Updates" in big bold text as one of the first and most prominent lines on the page so... yes? Is that a problem? Publications have had live-updating articles for things ongoing for years. This seems both entirely reasonable and normal, and I'm not sure what the concern or issue is.
  - red_Seashell_32 4mo ago
    As per submission guidelines: > Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. So, even if you use original title, once "Live Update" article changes, it might seem that submission did not use original title.
    - mynameisvlad 4mo ago
      The point of the rule is to not editorialize, not to keep an always-updating title.
      - munk-a 4mo ago
        Given that the title was highly accurate at time of submission perhaps a moderator will update the title further but the submission seems to be inline with all the guidelines. This is actually also a case where I think it wouldn't be unappreciated to deviate a bit from the article title to something like Live Updates: Astronauts on ISS told...
        mynameisvlad 4mo ago
        100% and it has regularly happened in the past as live updates change the current state. Things like service status/degradation is a big one that comes to mind which is almost the same.
  - glitcher 4mo ago
    I read their comment as a simple “oh ok I understand now” type of clarification, not a complaint.
dang 4mo ago
We've updated it above. Thanks! (Submitted title was "Astronauts on ISS told to shelter as repairs under way to fix air leaks", no doubt because that's what the article said at the time.)

by js2 4mo ago

As of 11 minutes ago, the headline is now the opposite of that submitted: > Astronauts told to return to International Space Station after sheltering over air leak repairs.

caminante 4mo ago

Oh, so it's a live blog with updates and a dynamic headline.

deleted 4mo ago
[deleted]
mynameisvlad 4mo ago
It has "Live Updates" in big bold text as one of the first and most prominent lines on the page so... yes? Is that a problem? Publications have had live-updating articles for things ongoing for years. This seems both entirely reasonable and normal, and I'm not sure what the concern or issue is.
- red_Seashell_32 4mo ago
  As per submission guidelines: > Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize. So, even if you use original title, once "Live Update" article changes, it might seem that submission did not use original title.
  - mynameisvlad 4mo ago
    The point of the rule is to not editorialize, not to keep an always-updating title.
    - munk-a 4mo ago
      Given that the title was highly accurate at time of submission perhaps a moderator will update the title further but the submission seems to be inline with all the guidelines. This is actually also a case where I think it wouldn't be unappreciated to deviate a bit from the article title to something like Live Updates: Astronauts on ISS told...
      - mynameisvlad 4mo ago
        100% and it has regularly happened in the past as live updates change the current state. Things like service status/degradation is a big one that comes to mind which is almost the same.
- glitcher 4mo ago
  I read their comment as a simple “oh ok I understand now” type of clarification, not a complaint.

dang 4mo ago

We've updated it above. Thanks! (Submitted title was "Astronauts on ISS told to shelter as repairs under way to fix air leaks", no doubt because that's what the article said at the time.)