3 ms·
“The audience of a changelog is entirely different than the audience for a commit log! A changelog is user-facing” I'd say that ship has probably sailed. Most
by brzz 4mo ago
“The audience of a changelog is entirely different than the audience for a commit log!
A changelog is user-facing”
I'd say that ship has probably sailed. Most companies are happy with “Bug Fixes & Performance Improvements”.
At least if they're not going to put the effort in, then a generated changelog is better than nothing.
- karmakaze 4mo agoThe best thing that I'd used for auto-updated software with weekly updates was to prefix user-facing visible commits with "uv:" Then each week we search for them and either use the text as-is or massage it slightly. We even got it into the product itself in the Help/Release-notes menu. Funny to ask to stop doing something I don't do or never even heard of. I typically only mark database schema migrations or other major things with special prefixes.
- beart 4mo agoI like this idea, but could see it working better as a git trailer to avoid adding noise to git log
- pancsta 4mo agoHe confuses changelog with release notes. Doesnt know how to name commits and probably doesnt know how to name symbols either. Skill issue and he’s sad, now in public. Move on…