3 ms·
How do you handle the risk of stripping out the exact stack trace the agent needed? That seems like the hard tradeoff here.
by devdoc83 4mo ago
How do you handle the risk of stripping out the exact
stack trace the agent needed? That seems like the hard
tradeoff here.
- itsthecourier 4mo agogonna ask the same... do far it's has been manually choosing what's useful in each command for the agents?
- zdkaster 4mo agoIt requires a bit effort in doing long-term adjustment and tuning for your agent common cli tools commands called. kinda need to evolve on day-to-day basis. But, agent itself can be useful to help tuning this.
- ramon156 4mo agoIn a perfect world the LLM needs to be very explicit on what it wants to read
- nixpulvis 4mo agoThe LLMs already do that themselves with `tail` all the time. There's a lot of room for improvement on top of that. Though they usually figure it out after a few tries. I often just paste manual runs errors myself anyway.
- zdkaster 4mo agoIt has the strip aggressiveness level suport. You can tune up 3 levels for each template output of your stacktrace using lowfat-filter dsl, shellscript or python.