> Bodycams that feature face recognition: Not OK, whether it's law enforcement or some weirdo at a night club. Ok, but... you know it's inevitable, right? Shop

> Bodycams that feature face recognition: Not OK, whether it's law enforcement or some weirdo at a night club. Ok, but... you know it's inevitable, right? Shops are already doing it, the first weirdo doing it at a nightclub is probably going to be the doorman (transferring the old "do not accept checks from this man" mugshots to the digital realm), I don't know about other countries but the UK police are doing it (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/police-use-of-facial-recognition/police-use-of-facial-recognition-factsheet https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/police-use-of-fac...). One of the advantages of bodycams for the police is that the people they deal with get a bit better behaved when they know they're on camera. I'm saying we should have that advantage too. (This is "an armed society is a polite society" redux - a surveilled society is a polite society?) Check out David Brin's concept of the Transparent Society. He's been banging on about this for a couple of decades, and he's a deeper thinker and more persuasive than I am. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Transparent_Society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Transparent_Society I stress I believe transparency is the least-worst option available to us, not the most desirable option.