4 ms·
That analogy doesn't work well. Their situation involved foreign powers enforcing jurisdiction and property claims over their land with a regular standing army;
by Erem 4mo ago
That analogy doesn't work well. Their situation involved foreign powers enforcing jurisdiction and property claims over their land with a regular standing army; a completely different situation than modern immigration
- moi2388 4mo agoYes. Now it’s through a judicial army based on criminalising speech, and instead of based on a country, based on a religion. Because that’s so much better
- Erem 4mo agoI certainly don't understand all you're saying through this tortured analogy, but yes an "army" of judges that issue rulings is much, much better than an army of soldiers that issue killings